(See: http://www.newswithviews.com/JBWilliams/williams150.htm)
I agree 100% with Mr. Williams that there has been total conspiracy in the Republican Party as well as the Marxist Party (aka Democrat Party) to redefine the SUPREME LAW OF OUR LAND. There has been a systematic effort by both of the big-buck parties to dismantle the US Constitution and the facts are now showing the proof of this assertion.
After reading William’s piece, I did a little digging of my own. I was surprised that as late as 2004 the US Senate did not have the foggiest idea what authority they were limited to under the U.S. Constitution. And for that matter, neither the House nor the Senate could comprehend their limited powers as far back as 1975 (and more.)
In 2004 , Republican Senator Don Nickles of Oklahoma, thought the Senate could trump the Constitution. He authored a bill that would bogusly REDEFINE the Constitution…(which is illegal!) Only a Constitutional Amendment can change the Constitution…after 2/3rds of the States have ratified the amendment.
This Nickle’s folly was called S.2128 and read as follows:
S.2128 -- Natural Born Citizen Act (Introduced in Senate - IS)
S 2128 IS
108th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. 2128
S 2128 IS
108th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. 2128
To define the term `natural born Citizen' as used in the Constitution of the United States to establish eligibility for the Office of President.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
February 25, 2004
Mr. NICKLES (for himself, Ms. LANDRIEU, and Mr. INHOFE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary February 25, 2004
A BILL
To define the term `natural born Citizen' as used in the Constitution of the United States to establish eligibility for the Office of President.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Natural Born Citizen Act'.
SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF `NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'.
(a) IN GENERAL- Congress finds and declares that the term `natural born Citizen' in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States means--
(1) any person born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof; and
(2) any person born outside the United States--
(A) who derives citizenship at birth from a United States citizen parent or parents pursuant to an Act of Congress; or
(B) who is adopted by 18 years of age by a United States citizen parent or parents who are otherwise eligible to transmit citizenship to a biological child pursuant to an Act of Congress.
(b) UNITED STATES- In this section, the term `United States', when used in a geographic sense, means the several States of the United States and the District of Columbia.
It should be thankfully noted that this unsuccessful bill was also tied in with S.1598 of that same year (2004) and was quoted in full.
(See http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?r108:1:./temp/~r108wj06PG:e93546: )
In both proposed pieces of legislation, S. 2128 and S. 1598 they both imply that any alien birthright citizen, born of alien parents, were NATURAL as long as they were born inside the boundaries of the United States. This clearly would be unconstitutional, because there is NO such definition which mirrors this new deviation of the Founding Father’s definition as found in the Law of Nations.
These Congress critters need to get into their thick-bone-heads that no Senate “legislation” can trump the U.S. Constitution! Only a Constitutional Amendment could/can solve this definition problem (if there truly is a problem with the definition that we have been living with for nearly 220 years.)
This continuing war to “trump the constitution” has going on for several decades. As Williams stated, Rep Jonathan B. Bingham flooded Congress with bills to redefine the NATURAL BORN CITIZEN clause of our Constitution (8 attempts in 22 months.)
94th Congress (1975 - 1976) - H.J.RES.33 & H.J.RES.38 - Constitutional Amendment - Provides that a citizen of the United States otherwise eligible to hold the Office of President shall not be ineligible because such citizen is not a natural born citizen.
Latest Title: Joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to the eligibility of a citizen to hold the Office of President.
Sponsor: Rep Bingham, Jonathan B. [NY-22] (introduced 1/4/1977) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 1/4/1977 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary.
And what I find amazing is that the Republicans have also swamped Congress with bills to LEGISLATE the decree that an alien child could have natural born citizen rights bestowed in opposition of the US Constitution.
Such legislation is show here:
H.R. 10407 - SUMMARY AS OF:
1/4/1977--Introduced.
Constitutional Amendment - Permits an otherwise eligible citizen of the United States to hold the office of President even if such individual is not a natural born citizen.
H.R.10407 - A bill for the relief of Ling-Yung Kung.
Declares a certain individual to be the natural-born alien son of two citizens of the United States, for purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
Sponsor: Rep Robinson, J. Kenneth
Site: Thomas
Original Format: Legislation
Date: 1977
H.R.10407
Latest Title: A bill for the relief of Ling-Yung Kung.
Sponsor: Rep Robinson, J. Kenneth [VA-7] (introduced 12/15/1977) Cosponsors (None) Private bill
Latest Major Action: 10/28/1978 Private Law 95-109.
-------------------------------------------
MAJOR ACTIONS:
12/15/1977 Introduced in House
8/2/1978 Reported to House from the Committee on the Judiciary with amendment, H. Rept. 95-1421.
8/15/1978 Passed/agreed to in House: Measure passed House, amended.
10/13/1978 Reported to Senate from the Committee on the Judiciary, S. Rept. 95-1398.
10/13/1978 Passed/agreed to in Senate: Measure passed Senate.
10/13/1978 Cleared for White House
10/24/1978 Measure presented to President.
10/28/1978 Signed by President.
10/28/1978 Private Law 95-109.
Please note:
ROBINSON, James Kenneth, a Representative from Virginia; born in Winchester, Frederick County, Va., May 14, 1916; attended the public schools of Winchester, Va.; B.S., Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, Va., 1937; served as infantryman in the United States Army, 1941-1945; discharged with the rank of major; elected to the Virginia State senate in 1965; reelected to a four-year term in 1967; chairman, Republican delegation to the 1968 and 1969 general assembly; orchardist and fruit packer with real estate and other business interests in the Winchester area; elected as a Republican to the Ninety-second and to the six succeeding Congresses (January 3, 1971-January 3, 1985); did not seek reelection to the Ninety-ninth Congress; was a resident of Winchester, Va., until his death there on April 8, 1990.
Currently I have been reading LETTERS to the EDITOR of the Canada Free Press to Rep Darrell Issa to “go after those in Congress” that do not follow the Constitution and enforce the Article II in the Constitution. But Issa was one of those morons who attempted to subvert the Constitution himself. In 2003 he co-sponsored a RESOLUTION (HJ Res 104) (with Barney Frank) to drop the words pertaining to the NATURAL BORN CITIZEN clause. Issa and his Marxist pal Barney strongly believe that the Natural Born Citizen clause is unnecessary and a Constitutional Amendment must be put before the states to RE-WRITE the Constitution. (See: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:H.J.RES.59:)
In 2004 Rep Dana ROHRABACHER also tried to murder Article II . See his attempt at:
See: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:H.J.RES.104:
Rohrabacher said in his remarks about his bill "that the Constitution was archaic at best.” See remarks at:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?r108:1:./temp/~r1083Yjxu5::
Here is one of the paragraphs from his speech in Congress:
“The reasons the founding fathers added this clause to the constitution are archaic at best. The main rationale was to protect the U.S. from undue foreign influence from the election of a foreign leader in the executive office. This mindset prevailed not long after the founders freed the country from the control of a foreign body. Interestingly, however, in what is called ``the Hamilton loophole,'' they exempted their own generation from the burdens of the ``natural born'' requirement. Seven of the 39 signers of the Constitution in Philadelphia in 1787 were foreign born, as well as 8 of America's original 81 Senators and Representatives, 3 of our first 10 Supreme Court justices, 4 of our first 6 secretaries of the treasury, and one of our first 3 secretaries of war. Most, if not all, of these immigrants were eligible to serve as president, since the constitution exempted all those who were citizens at the time the constitution was adopted from the ``natural born'' requirement.”
Then, a year later (2005) George Bush screamed, "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face!" "It's just a g*dd*mned piece of paper!" And that same year US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, while still White House counsel, wrote that the "Constitution is an outdated document."
And King Soetoro (aka BHO), during a 2001 radio interview, said “the U.S. Constitution is flawed and the nation still suffers because of that failure.”
It is my opinion that the US Constitution can never be resurrected and brought back to life, as long as a single Republican or Democrat remain in office. For 150 years (since Lincoln) both parties have spit on the Constitution - - and today, they still spit on this old dead horse.
No comments:
Post a Comment